Teams

RBW-Netchix-Williams

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesElena Ivanova / Erin Kleiber vs Sally Crabtree Martin / Karla Sperber3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesPamela King vs Ingrid Wheelock7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Becherer / Tina Richards vs Danielle Raub / Darci Wyman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTami DeVita / Dawn Williams vs Leona De Rocco / Trisna Tanus1-6, 0-6
2022-03-06vs STC-AncinasLost 13
L#1 DoublesTina Richards / Nancy Elkasrawy vs Sarah Owens / Alison Herber4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Ouyang vs Bokgi Choi6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Bridget Greenberg vs Megan Slade / Diane Whitfield2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Williams / Takako Chavez vs April Ancinas / Becca Tessin2-6, 6-7
2022-03-04vs TCSP-Love Hurts-ChowWon 31
W#1 DoublesErin Kleiber / Elena Ivanova vs Shirley Chow / Tiffini Connell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Ouyang vs Robin Freedman6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Nancy Elkasrawy vs Jennifer Gale / Cindy Jed4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela King / Dawn Williams vs Dana Forfylow / Erin Hawk2-6, 5-7
2022-02-19vs BC-Clemente 3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesTina Richards / Melinda Caldas vs Shelley Holm / Nancy Fletcher4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Elkasrawy vs Nicole Hill0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Steager Coe / Tammy Myers vs Lauren Fisher / Jennifer Clemente4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTami DeVita / Elena Ivanova vs Marilyn Johnson / Cindy WebberMeeks1-6, 2-6
2022-01-30vs EDG-Las Chiquitas-KainzSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErin Kleiber / Elena Ivanova vs Edna Kainz / Ying-Fang Lai1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Ouyang vs Holly Ng6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Takako Chavez vs Dorothy Lowes / Terry Yuan5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTami DeVita / Dawn Williams vs Lainie Dickson / Asa Watts6-4, 6-3
2022-01-23vs AYTC-LeeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLori Steager Coe / Cathy Skeen vs Susanne Wagner-Fischer / Kimberly Earles6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Ouyang vs Jennifer Wood6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Becherer / A C vs Sandra Jerez / Julie Yee2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Takako Chavez vs Marcy Stafford / Maura Dunn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-16vs CAC/SL-Wanat 3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJaye Siqueiros / Genevieve Tremblay vs Diane Murray / Maria Henriksen-Marks1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Ouyang vs Mei Yang7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTina Richards / Erin Kleiber vs Jinhee Park / Anne Roth1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Elkasrawy / Takako Chavez vs Kimberly Caponigro / Jennifer Kink4-6, 0-6
2022-01-08vs ETC-VoLost 04
L#1 DoublesTina Richards / Nancy Becherer vs Hong Vo / Melissa McMurray2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPamela King vs Cathleen Summers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElena Ivanova / Jaye Siqueiros vs Bridget Charters / DeeDee Schubert6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTami DeVita / Jeanne Satagaj vs Sarah Wilke / Shannon Poll6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PSC-Zhang/Olano90251122237
2BC-Clemente 3.5W8025722225
3AYTC-Ballers-Niset81251128283
4RBW-BigMacs-McAllen81241229275
5NTC-Shake and Bake-Solimano7228821275
6FC-Tenacious-Mar72251128268
7TCSP-Tennisanity-Golden72221430273
8EDG-Las Chiquitas-Kainz62211125250
9NTC-Simply Smashing! Vecchio/Miller6223927247
10CAC/SL-Wanat 3.5W62201230253
11MI-Goodman 3.5W63221436317
12CP-Garnett54211534303
13CP-Rally Cats-Bauer54191738332
14ETC-Vail54221440324
15HBSQ-Burdyshaw54181840312
16RBW-Rasanen54181841344
17ETC-Vo44151744309
18NTC-Love ‘Em and Leave ‘Em-Zimbelman45221438328
19ETC-Wyer45201640323
20PL-Wood45181842349
21BC-Bloch 3.5W45162045337
22AYTC-Lov'n D'Aces-Padilla45152146337
23WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-Gai36171946352
24BAIN-Wiggins36142247363
25NTC-Whitman36152149360
26STC-Ancinas26122043307
27RBW-Netchix-Williams26112147326
28BC-Birch/Gerard27142248361
29BETC-Mansfield27122451368
30CAC/SL-Smart Aces-McGoldrick27102656390
31TCSP-Love Hurts-Chow1792351335
32AYTC-Lee1782452340
33STC-Avengers-Anderson1872959389
34BELL-Caldwell 3.5W1882862417
35HBSQ-Vitco/Clark1863062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Tammy Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Rachel Ouyang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Erin Kleiber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Lori Steager Coe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Elena Ivanova
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.88
Jeanne Satagaj
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Tina Richards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Cathy Skeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Tami DeVita
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Takako Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Pamela King
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Bridget Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.30
Dawn Williams
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Genevieve Tremblay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Becherer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Elkasrawy
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Ivanova + Dawn Williams25860% games+2.4% vs expected
Bridget Greenberg + Jeanne Satagaj4449% games+1.5% vs expected
Tammy Myers + Nancy Becherer4549% games−5.3% vs expected
Takako Chavez + Dawn Williams51741% games−7.1% vs expected
Tina Richards + Tammy Myers2440% games−10.3% vs expected
Erin Kleiber + Elena Ivanova4247% gamesnot enough data
Tina Richards + Lori Steager Coe3253% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Myers + Lori Steager Coe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Myers
14W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Rachel Ouyang
86W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erin Kleiber
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lori Steager Coe
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elena Ivanova
101W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Jeanne Satagaj
23W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Tina Richards
25W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cathy Skeen
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Tami DeVita
48W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Takako Chavez
37W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
Pamela King
47W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Bridget Greenberg
36W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
2.5
Dawn Williams
88W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
Genevieve Tremblay
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Becherer
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Elkasrawy
59W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.