Teams

LSBR-Brynn/BRP

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 6.5 Women 18s

15 players · average NTRP 3.15 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-02vs LMCO-Collins/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristy Del Monte / Christina Prejean vs Caroline Raynor / KJ Gibson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristy Simmons / Devon Fuller vs Nicole Kayton / Madelyn Palomeque6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Nicole Cochran / Amy Cullen6-1, 6-1
2026-08-19vs LLHA-Haberman-Richmond/BaileyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Leah Rand / Erin Lee2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Tirabassi / Liz Cloninger vs Tia Allocco / Leenee Roberge6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Watson / Mary Clare Hainsworth vs Sheila Miller / Valerie Richmond0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 6.5 Women 18s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLBA-Bartolucci/River Run2051446
2LSPE-Pensler-Barber/Edgemoor1030011
3LJWO-Wolters-Ahern/Trump1021216
4LCRO-Russo-Rowland/Jetton1021223
5LMCO-Collins/Westport1021325
6LLME-Mele/Jetton1142446
7LAMA-Marin/Bailey 18s 6.5 Wed pm1142643
8LKRO-Rogers/Westport1124852
9LLHA-Haberman-Richmond/Bailey1133855
10LTAZ AZAMOVA 6.5FR/CRP000000
11LSBR-Brynn/BRP0112429
12LJFR-Frye-Pangilinan/Bailey0112533
13LTKR-Krohn/LNRC02151062
14LSNI-Niblack-Siler/Jetton02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kristy Del Monte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Devon Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.30
Kristy Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Christina Prejean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.27
Mandy Tirabassi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Laurie Watson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.25
Meredith Romley
published 3
3.25
Sayra Brynn
published 3.5
3.25
Liz Cloninger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.25
Elizangela Kato
published 3.5
3.20
Danielle Fowler
published 3
3.19
Caroline Kaspar
published 3
2.95
Tiffani Japec
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Mary Clare Hainsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Watson + Meredith Romley6084% games+23.3% vs expected
Meredith Romley + Liz Cloninger10171% games+18.4% vs expected
Danielle Fowler + Meredith Romley8069% games+5.9% vs expected
Cindy Japec + Tiffani Japec8656% games+5.9% vs expected
Caroline Kaspar + Kristy Del Monte3254% gamesnot enough data
Kristy Del Monte + Elizangela Kato314 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Fowler + Liz Cloninger303 matchesnot enough data
Sayra Brynn + Kristy Del Monte213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristy Del Monte
41W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Devon Fuller
97W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.34
Kristy Simmons
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Christina Prejean
66W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Mandy Tirabassi
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Laurie Watson
40W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.25
3
Meredith Romley
88W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Sayra Brynn
74W–55L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Liz Cloninger
71W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Elizangela Kato
9W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Danielle Fowler
120W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Caroline Kaspar
39W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Tiffani Japec
51W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Mary Clare Hainsworth
74W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.