Teams

tumlin

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesTom Gattrell / Hubert Rodriguez vs Charlie Rogers / Billy Le6-4, 6-4
2026-07-13Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Goff / Jeff Williams vs Mark Camp / Ronald Seawright6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTom Gattrell / Daniel Leonard vs Charlie Rogers / Larry Sewell6-2, 6-3
2026-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesTom Gattrell / Hubert Rodriguez vs Mark Camp / Jeff McRae6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1tumlin40111270
2Camp0411122139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jeff Williams
published
3.72
Bill Mason
published 4
3.68
Craig Tumlin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.68
Kelly Goff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
David Weir
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.33
Jimmy Warren
published
3.30
Cary Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Daniel Leonard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Hubert Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Tom Gattrell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Weir + Jimmy Warren4639% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + Cary Stokes4260% gamesnot enough data
Craig Tumlin + David Weir4167% gamesnot enough data
David Weir + Cary Stokes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Williams
36W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Bill Mason
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Craig Tumlin
35W–19L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.68
Kelly Goff
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
David Weir
17W–12L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jimmy Warren
25W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Cary Stokes
15W–13L career · 15 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Daniel Leonard
10W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Hubert Rodriguez
8W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Gattrell
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.