Teams

Harris Lawn and Tennis

2023 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.5 Senior Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-07vs Kitrell CCNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Harris / Lynn Goldhammer vs Susi Tarvis / Theresa Roach1-6, 1-6
2023-04-23vs Nixon Lawn and TennisLost 02
L#2 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Kumson Karsner vs Lisa Nixon / Laura Davidson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJami Sitzler / Lynn Goldhammer vs Cynthia Hall / Kimberly Wood1-6, 1-6
2023-04-16vs Floyd Fayetteville Racquet ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Harris / Marcy Isenhart vs Susan Edmonds / Sandra Jones2-6, 1-6
2023-04-02vs Nixon Lawn and TennisLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Harris / Marcy Isenhart vs Lisa Nixon / Laura Davidson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJodie Fondrie / Lynn Goldhammer vs Deborah Masotti / Mary Bonsall2-6, 3-6
2023-03-05vs Kitrell CCNCLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Cindy Kennedy vs Elizabeth Webster / Cornelia Morris0-6, 3-6
2023-02-21vs Floyd Fayetteville Racquet ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEllen Harris / Lynn Goldhammer vs Pia Thompson / Seema Krishna Joshi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Cassie Drexel vs Harriett Shooter / Karen Rogers4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Marcy Isenhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Jami Sitzler
published
2.92
Kumson Karsner
published
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
2.59
Cindy Kennedy
published 3
Kathy Maas
published
Sue Franklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Goldhammer + Marcy Isenhart0631% games−3.0% vs expected
Kumson Karsner + Marcy Isenhart2450% gamesnot enough data
Jami Sitzler + Marcy Isenhart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marcy Isenhart
11W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Jami Sitzler
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kumson Karsner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Cynthia Ballantyne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Cindy Kennedy
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.59
Kathy Maas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Franklin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.