Teams

Lagoon-Holmes2 4.0 Mixed

2025 Spring USTA Mixed 18 & Over League-Montgomery · 4.0 18 & Over Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-23vs Lagoon-Holmes 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Bibb / Albert Smith vs Thadeus Cacanindin / Sofi Gelabert5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cobb / Justin Ward vs Vanessa Brown / Antonio Holmes6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-16vs Lagoon-Holmes 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Ward / Amanda Senn vs Natali Wiedemann / Stephen Nettelhorst2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Bibb / Richard Caldwell vs Edwin Hampton / Charlotte Henderson2-6, 5-7
2025-02-09vs Lagoon-Holmes 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJustin Ward / Amanda Senn vs Leslie Calloway / Jarred Kaplan2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlbert Smith / Elizabeth Cobb vs Antonio Holmes / Natali Wiedemann6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Lagoon-Holmes 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Cobb / Justin Ward vs Olivier Dury / Natali Wiedemann5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Elliott / Albert Smith vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Michelle Slack1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 18 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Elizabeth Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Holly Adcock
published
3.75
Albert Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Bibb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Stephen Gratz
published
3.40
Will Jacks
published
3.40
Justin Ward
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Amanda Senn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Emily Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Richard Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kirktavious Johnson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Cobb
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Holly Adcock
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Albert Smith
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Kelly Bibb
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Stephen Gratz
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Will Jacks
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Justin Ward
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Senn
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Emily Elliott
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Richard Caldwell
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Kirktavious Johnson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.