← Teams

WHRC-Nakatani

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Heather MacPherson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Emily Qi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Karen Harlow
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Katherine McMillan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Gail Bolte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kristin Bialobok
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Yanchen Qi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Inge Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.19
Astrid Andreu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Dalpiaz
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Xia Yuan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Ann Kitchen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Wendy Nakatani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Sheila Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results15 ties
2024-06-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Collins / Inge Marshall vs Maggie Hudson / Lisa Reid6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesInge Marshall / Emily Qi vs Kelly Hewitt / Wendy Clarke6-3, 6-4
2024-06-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesInge Marshall / Emily Qi vs Rebecca Clements / Maiko Winkler Chin6-1, 6-4
2024-06-08Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesInge Marshall / Heather MacPherson vs Dolores Corley / Lisa Hockman7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesXia Yuan vs Xiaolu Huang7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Bialobok / Amanda Lowthian vs Jenna Dornblaser / Jeny Joseph7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Harlow / Astrid Andreu vs Barbara Gram / Lauren Smith6-0, 6-4
2024-05-26Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Gail Bolte vs Betty Roux / Laura Shier6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesXia Yuan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Bialobok / Astrid Andreu vs Janet Ha / Ann Tu6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Kitchen / Inge Marshall vs Loraine Shears / Catherine Huang6-1, 6-0
2024-05-12Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesGail Bolte / Heather MacPherson vs Morgan Towle / Michelle Zawadzki2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Harlow vs Kristen LaBarca6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Katherine McMillan vs Blythe Knott / Jennifer Johnson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesInge Marshall / Sheila Schmidt vs Jenny Marston / Nichole Anglin6-2, 6-3
2024-05-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesGail Bolte / Heather MacPherson vs Jeri Finn / Hanny Tan6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesXia Yuan vs Katie Jurgenson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine McMillan / Jessica Dalpiaz vs Kayla Casebeer / Deana Julka6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Qi / Inge Marshall vs Becky Holzman / Deb Garris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-05Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesGail Bolte / Sheila Schmidt vs Gabriela McIntosh / Ann Arp7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesXia Yuan vs Christina Melander6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather MacPherson / Inge Marshall vs Megan Finn / Shawn Sefchick7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Ann Kitchen vs Sarah Robertson / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-3, 7-5
2024-05-04Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesGail Bolte / Heather MacPherson vs Clarice Brown / Janae Pyle6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKaren Harlow vs Sara Vanderhoff6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesYanchen Qi / Emily Qi vs Becky Holzman / Hanny Tan6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Inge Marshall vs Tammy Cofield / Sara Crate6-2, 6-3
2024-04-28Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesWendy Nakatani / Kristin Bialobok vs Kristen LaBarca / Michelle Zawadzki5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Morgan Towle6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Kitchen / Amanda Lowthian vs Teresa Chan / Julie LaMontagne6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Katherine McMillan vs Wendy Schmidt / Jenny Marston6-1, 6-4
2024-04-12Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesYanchen Qi / Emily Qi vs Wendi Ouellette / Jane Paulsen0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesXia Yuan vs Natasha Rinard6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Katherine McMillan vs Britani Kavanaugh / Abby Hata6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Harlow / Astrid Andreu vs Amy Vandenbroucke / Julia Henry6-3, 6-3
2023-12-10Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Skip Potter vs Matt Savage / Teresa Zhao7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-12-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Skip Potter vs Dana Nolan / Lech Kaiel6-0, 6-1
2023-12-03Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesHeather MacPherson / Inge Marshall vs Kim Wright / Julia Hall7-6, 6-2
2023-12-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesInge Marshall / Heather MacPherson vs Laura Rundle / Shari Levelle6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather MacPherson
64W–35L career
0%71%29%
3.54
3.5
Emily Qi
87W–54L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Karen Harlow
80W–58L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Katherine McMillan
49W–14L career
1%90%9%
3.36
3.5
Gail Bolte
93W–77L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Kristin Bialobok
42W–33L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Yanchen Qi
29W–55L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Inge Marshall
58W–32L career
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Astrid Andreu
39W–28L career · type A
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Jessica Dalpiaz
18W–18L career
28%72%0%
3.06
3.5
Xia Yuan
53W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Kitchen
27W–36L career
33%67%0%
3.01
3.5
Wendy Nakatani
30W–41L career
36%64%0%
3.00
3.5
Sheila Schmidt
38W–69L career
44%56%0%
2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.