Teams

LOTC-Keyser/Hilden

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Shweta Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.20
Robyn Hilden
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2025-03-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShaun Anderson / Shweta Agrawal vs Amelia Ryan / Kara Petracca6-1, 6-3
2025-03-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hilden vs Lina Gao6-3, 6-1
2025-02-16Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Erin Keyser vs Teresa Chan / Kelley Malama6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesShweta Agrawal vs Marissa Franck6-4, 6-1
2025-02-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Julie Mathews vs Melissa Maxwell / Angie Keam6-3, 6-4
2025-01-25Split 11
W#1 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Erin Keyser vs Valerie Neill / Jennifer Oh6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLei Ma / Shweta Agrawal vs Kim Wallace / Gwen Kulak6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesShweta Agrawal vs Kelley Malama4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hilden vs Sumner Brooks7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Shweta Agrawal
94W–36L career
0%2%98%
3.35
3.5
Robyn Hilden
86W–68L career
3%97%0%
3.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.