Teams

TTC - Thomas 55s

2026 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Fall 55 & over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-08vs Canterbury IHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Bristow / Betty Freeman vs Laura Ryan / Cindy Gilmore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Baxter / Beth Thomas vs Rene Sheffield / Kim Harwood3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Rombokas / Margaret Nasir vs Charlene Mann / Rhonda Allen3-6, 3-6
2026-01-04vs Canterbury IHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenifer Spears / Margaret Nasir vs Laura Ryan / Linda Canterbury2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Baxter / Lisa Bristow vs Carol Mills / Christy Duren7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hornsby / Charlotte Patton vs Brenna Askew / Rhonda Allen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-04vs Canterbury IHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Rombokas / Jenifer Spears vs Linda Canterbury / Carol Mills2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Bristow / Beth Thomas vs Leigh Wright / Cindy Gilmore1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Baxter / Margaret Nasir vs Rene Sheffield / Susan Whitley2-6, 4-6
2025-12-13vs Canterbury IHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hornsby / Lisa Bristow vs Carol Mills / Susan Whitley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Baxter / Betty Freeman vs Leigh Wright / Leigh Killian3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLoWanda James / Margaret Nasir vs Brenna Askew / Sandy Pettus2-6, 4-6
2025-12-07vs Canterbury IHCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenifer Spears / Lee Embry vs Carol Mills / Laura Ryan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Rombokas / LoWanda James vs Christy Duren / Linda Canterbury3-6, 3-6
2025-11-18vs Canterbury IHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hornsby / Jenifer Spears vs Leigh Killian / Cindy Gilmore2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Rombokas / Lee Embry vs Linda Canterbury / Laura Ryan1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBetty Freeman / Beth Thomas vs Sandy Pettus / Charlene Mann6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Canterbury IHCC511537106
2TTC - Thomas 55s1531532203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Kathryn Hornsby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Betty Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Charlotte Patton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Sarah Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Jenifer Spears
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Lisa Bristow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Lee Embry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Judy Rombokas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
LoWanda James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Beth Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Margaret Nasir
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Thomas + Jenifer Spears4158% games+18.1% vs expected
Lee Embry + Beth Thomas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Hornsby
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Betty Freeman
1W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Charlotte Patton
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Baxter
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jenifer Spears
23W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Lisa Bristow
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lee Embry
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Judy Rombokas
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
LoWanda James
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Beth Thomas
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Margaret Nasir
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.