Teams

2 Morgan’s Stand at Belmont

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesSung Kang / Jason Voigt vs Travis Miller / Tyler Crone6-4, 7-6
2023-07-16vs 5 JRHS Stephens 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesScott Kim / Jason Voigt vs Keith Adams / Luis Rodriguez-Miranda6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSung Kang vs Seunghun Ok6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrian Rowe / Yong Ko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-09vs 3 MAC SnowWon 10
W#1 SinglesYong Ko vs Keith Garrison6-3, 6-2
2023-06-18vs 3 MAC SnowWon 20
W#1 SinglesYong Ko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Nelson / Sung Kang vs Wayne Motley / Donnell Stewart6-0, 6-3
2023-06-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesJason Voigt / Sung Kang vs Ben Hall / Todd Prince6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-11vs 5 JRHS Stephens 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesSung Kang / Jay Nelson vs Jimmy Ghaphery / Warren Smigo7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJason Voigt / Scott Kim vs Chris Gillam / Greg Deeb6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Brian Rowe
published 4.5
4.45
John Chenault V
published
Craig Morgan
published 4.5
4.19
Sung Kang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Dale Nowery
published 4.5
4.03
Yong Ko
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Jason Voigt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.96
Jay Nelson
published
Will Kaufmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Voigt + Sung Kang3252% gamesnot enough data
Scott Kim + Jason Voigt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
4.46
John Chenault V
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Craig Morgan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Dale Nowery
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Yong Ko
99W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Jason Voigt
75W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
Jay Nelson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
Will Kaufmann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.