Teams

LDyer (Mountainbrook)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-21vs MMcHugh (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMeghan Walker / Keller Earnst vs Lauren Leazer / Lindsey Pond2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Dyer / Lauren Davenport vs Jennifer Paloski / Nicole Umpleby2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Poutier / Lacey Wolski vs Emily White / Tara Marcel3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-14vs CMiller (Charlotte CC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Purdy / Meghan Walker vs Tara Cawthorne / Emily Oakford5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth McGregor / Katie White vs Page Gatewood / Erin Stubbs6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLindsay Dyer / Jamie Pearman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-07vs TRogovin (JCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJoanne Lindley / Katie White vs Tina Rogovin / Caryn Craige6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Walker / Jamie Pearman vs Maria Tsadaka / Maria Palios6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSerena Kossisyan-Perlman / Kay Sowers vs Lisa Cosolito / Susan Scanga6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Keller Earnst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Meghan Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Jamie Pearman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Suzanne Purdy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Anne Poutier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Kelly Blandford
published 3
2.84
Joanne Lindley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Lacey Wolski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Lauren Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Elizabeth McGregor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lindsay Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Serena Kossisyan-Perlman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Ellen Gibel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Sowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Blandford + Joanne Lindley1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keller Earnst
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Meghan Walker
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Jamie Pearman
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Suzanne Purdy
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Anne Poutier
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Kelly Blandford
21W–39L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Joanne Lindley
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Lacey Wolski
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Lauren Davenport
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Elizabeth McGregor
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Lindsay Dyer
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Serena Kossisyan-Perlman
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Ellen Gibel
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kay Sowers
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.