Teams

Harris-Shalimar Pointe

2025 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-13vs OWB/Zaborski/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Harris / John Quarles vs Hari Prasad / Robert Abbott4-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs OWB/Zaborski/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Hambleton / Paul Harris vs Christopher Moore / Tommy Zaner1-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs Thrift-PCRCLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaul Harris vs Caleb Kembro3-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs Thrift-PCRCLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Harris / John Quarles vs Glenn Griffin / John Taylor6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Thrift-PCRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Hooks / George Hambleton vs Glenn Griffin / John Taylor5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPaul Harris vs Caleb Kembro0-6, 4-6
2025-03-16vs Thrift-PCRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Hooks / William Grigsby vs Glenn Griffin / John Taylor6-2, 7-5
2025-02-01vs OWB/Zaborski/40&Over4.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Hooks / Byron Cotton vs Christopher Moore / Bart Salim6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaul Harris / Henry Bonar vs Todd Zaborski / Hari Prasad0-6, 0-6
2025-02-01vs OWB/Zaborski/40&Over4.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Hooks / Byron Cotton vs Christopher Moore / Tommy Zaner7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Harris / John Quarles vs Bart Salim / Robert DeMars6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Henry Bonar
published
3.97
John Quarles
published
3.93
John Hooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Byron Cotton
published 4
3.66
Mark Violette
published
3.42
Paul Harris
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
George Hambleton
published
Issam Khouri
published
William Grigsby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henry Bonar + John Quarles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry Bonar
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
John Quarles
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
John Hooks
67W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Byron Cotton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Mark Violette
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Paul Harris
33W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
George Hambleton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Issam Khouri
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Grigsby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.