Teams

Schmitz, Neil

2025 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Combo - Men - 55

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-13vs HOA/Granger/55&over7.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Hargroves / Tom Rosewicz vs ANDRE CURIEL / Kenneth Collins2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Hooper / William Olson vs Roy True / Jeff Eskew1-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs HOAWC/Fabrizius/55&over7.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeil Schmitz / John Ammatelli vs Mark McDonald / Dan David7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Hooper / Kent Erickson vs JOHN CRAIG / Bill Roller0-6, 5-7
2025-05-18vs HOA/Granger/55&over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Hargroves / Elias Pimentel vs Kenneth Collins / David Coleman6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Murry / Tom Rosewicz vs Mitchell Bennett / Michael Curley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Olson / Paul Watkins vs Steve Baker / John Larson2-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs HOAWC/Fabrizius/55&over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesElias Pimentel / John Ammatelli vs Steve Fabrizius / Andy Brez3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Murry / William Olson vs Jeff Nelson / Randall Jensen1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNeil Schmitz / Dennis Lawlor vs JOHN CRAIG / Jason Norberg6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Combo - Men - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jeff Hargroves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Paul Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Neil Schmitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
John Ammatelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tom Rosewicz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Kent Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Elias Pimentel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Dennis Lawlor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
John Murry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Hargroves + John Ammatelli224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Hargroves
28W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Paul Watkins
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Neil Schmitz
54W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
John Ammatelli
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Tom Rosewicz
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Kent Erickson
20W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.00
3.5
Elias Pimentel
23W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Dennis Lawlor
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
John Murry
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.91
Scott Hooper
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.