Teams

NRubin

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11vs AMcCollumLost 01
L#2 DoublesDora Reed / Sharon Kucyk vs Amanda Bauer / Kelly Huffstetler3-6, 2-6
2022-05-04vs SWilhelmyLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Meghan Kofod vs Gillian Kelleher / Kristine Sibillia2-6, 4-6
2022-04-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesDora Reed / Sharon Kucyk vs Melanie Lachance / Lisa Austin6-3, 6-4
2022-04-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Dora Reed vs Lauren King / Julie Clark1-6, 1-6
2022-04-08vs MLaddLost 01
L#2 DoublesAna Maria Allessi / Dora Reed vs Dana Rawls / Candice Kish6-7, 1-6
2022-03-23vs SWilhelmyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDora Reed / Sharon Kucyk vs Cheri Kohan / Lisa Carley4-6, 0-6
2022-03-16vs DLangeLost 01
L#1 DoublesGrace McPherson / Sharon Kucyk vs Allison DeMacy / Denise Lange2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-16vs MEverittWon 20
W#2 DoublesNicole Peterson / Ana Maria Allessi vs Lan Bello / Melanie Lachance7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Dora Reed vs Dana McNally / Lisa Austin6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Meghan Kofod
published 3.5
3.06
Karen Cody
published
2.88
Ellen Osbourne
published 3
2.86
Mitzi Ellis
published
2.81
Dawn Johnstone
published 3
2.78
Sharon Kucyk
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.75
Dora Reed
published 3
2.70
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dora Reed + Dawn Johnstone224 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Kofod + Ana Maria Allessi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meghan Kofod
76W–134L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Cody
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Ellen Osbourne
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Mitzi Ellis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Dawn Johnstone
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Sharon Kucyk
110W–118L career · 14 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Dora Reed
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.