Teams

Sandbaggers

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Men 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-16vs Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Gates / Shawn Oram vs Brian Young / Howard Hansen5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJules Miller / Jameson Johnson vs Nathan Richardson / Gary Clay1-6, 0-6
2022-06-15vs Double TroubleLost 12
L#1 DoublesHayden Paulsen / Chad Clark vs Bryce Batista / Neil Marion4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPat Gates / Brendan McGeehan vs Brady Smith / Brandon Smith2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJameson Johnson / Shawn Oram vs Nathan Richardson / David Lu6-2, 6-3
2022-06-12vs Double TroubleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAdan Eledesma / Jules Miller vs Brian Young / Gary Clay1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLevi Jensen vs Bryce Batista1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEugene Manalo / John M Head vs Brandon Smith / Nathan Richardson2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShawn Oram vs Jordon Michaelson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Pat Gates vs David Lu / Howard Hansen4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-02vs Double TroubleLost 23
L#1 DoublesShawn Oram / Jameson Johnson vs Brady Smith / Brandon Smith2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarcus Andrews vs Nathan Richardson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJules Miller / Pat Gates vs Brian Young / Gary Clay1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAdan Eledesma vs Joshua Ellis4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Chad Clark vs Darren Hansen / David Lu6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-02vs Double TroubleLost 23
L#1 DoublesEugene Manalo / John M Head vs Brian Young / Brady Smith1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPat Gates vs Nathan Richardson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Oram / Jameson Johnson vs Howard Hansen / Cameron Topliff1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLevi Jensen vs Joshua Ellis4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Jules Miller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-23vs Double TroubleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJameson Johnson / Levi Jensen vs Nathan Richardson / Gary Clay1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarcus Andrews vs Jordon Michaelson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChad Clark / Shawn Oram vs Brady Smith / Brandon Smith2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAdan Eledesma vs Darren Hansen3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPat Gates / Brendan McGeehan vs Howard Hansen / Jared Stein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-17vs Double TroubleLost 13
L#1 DoublesEugene Manalo / Jules Miller vs Howard Hansen / Gary Clay6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLevi Jensen vs Nathan Richardson0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChad Clark / Hayden Paulsen vs Brady Smith / Brandon Smith2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Shawn Oram vs Darren Hansen / Cameron Topliff6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-12vs Double TroubleLost 04
L#1 DoublesEugene Manalo / Brendan McGeehan vs Gary Clay / Brian Young0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLevi Jensen vs Nathan Richardson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPat Gates / Chad Clark vs Brandon Smith / Brady Smith6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMarcus Andrews vs Jordon Michaelson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Shawn Oram
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Eugene Manalo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Brendan McGeehan
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.69
Pat Gates
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Adan Eledesma
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Chad Clark
published
Hayden Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jameson Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
John M Head
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jules Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Levi Jensen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Marcus Andrews
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Gates + Brendan McGeehan10359% games+5.4% vs expected
Pat Gates + Shawn Oram41045% games+3.5% vs expected
Brendan McGeehan + Shawn Oram3453% games−2.1% vs expected
Eugene Manalo + Jules Miller033 matchesnot enough data
Eugene Manalo + John M Head123 matchesnot enough data
Jules Miller + John M Head213 matchesnot enough data
Jules Miller + Pat Gates123 matchesnot enough data
Jameson Johnson + Shawn Oram213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shawn Oram
80W–84L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Eugene Manalo
3W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brendan McGeehan
105W–88L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Pat Gates
106W–116L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Adan Eledesma
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Chad Clark
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Hayden Paulsen
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jameson Johnson
5W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
John M Head
76W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jules Miller
24W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Levi Jensen
67W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcus Andrews
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.