Teams

COLLAZO

2022 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Afternoon Doubles Women · Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-07vs RYANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Arbo / Mairin Kuligowski vs Kathy Hoehner / Suzanne McMullen6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Emily Covington vs Lindsey Frye / Michelle Grande6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-03-02vs McFARLANELost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Mandy Bertin vs Nicole Leppert / Carrie Cardiff3-6, 4-6
2022-02-23vs HUGHESWon 20
W#1 DoublesLyn Fay / Mairin Kuligowski vs Deanne Iverson / Donna Stewart6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Mandy Bertin vs HEATHER HUGHES / Mary Beth Williamson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-17vs SMITHLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Marcotte / Stephanie Peebles vs Kerry Smith / Beth Koyne4-6, 3-6
2022-02-09vs SCHAEFERWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Danielle Davis / Anne Flam3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-03vs KOTTERWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Marcotte / Kristin Satterfield vs Paula Garrison / Tina Woods6-3, 6-2
2022-01-28vs HOPKINS/LARNERWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Shevlin / Mairin Kuligowski vs Janet Thede / Kristi Nault6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Kristin Satterfield vs Mary Krueger / Jennifer Hepler7-6, 7-6
2022-01-21vs McFARLANELost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Arbo / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Pamela Nix / Michelle Tenhaeff2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kristin Satterfield
published
3.27
Mandy Bertin
published
Emily Covington
published 3.5
3.17
Mairin Kuligowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Marcotte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Stephanie Peebles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Diana Shevlin
published 3.5
Lisa Arbo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Marcotte + Stephanie Peebles4347% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Satterfield
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Mandy Bertin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Covington
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mairin Kuligowski
53W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–176L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Stephanie Peebles
124W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Diana Shevlin
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
Lisa Arbo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.