Teams

VHiguchi-CHTC

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-04vs MFitzgerald-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvonne Acker / Jane Thrailkill vs Cindy Orlandini / Kim Ledlow0-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs KCarson-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Acker / Melissa Fitzpatrick vs Heather Kane / Patty Hubbard6-0, 6-1
2025-03-21vs KHoekstra-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesYvonne Acker / Beth Nielsen vs Pamela Cherry / Mary Fortin6-7, 3-6
2025-03-14vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesVirginia Higuchi / Beth Spinarski vs Beth Clark / Nancy Sickel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-07vs MParker-YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Spinarski / Jane Thrailkill vs Mary Parker / Maya Ress7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYvonne Acker / Lynne Farber vs Lisa Griffin / Lisa Kempf7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-28vs DHostetler-HRWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Spinarski / Melissa Fitzpatrick vs Marcella Bria / Martha Schulwitz6-1, 6-1
2025-02-26vs CBowman-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Beth Spinarski vs Diane Koenigshofer / Marybeth Evers7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Melissa Fitzpatrick
published
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.27
Beth Spinarski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Sara Summers
published
3.20
Denise Corey
published 3.5
3.20
Virginia Higuchi
published
3.18
Lynne Farber
published
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.12
Jane Thrailkill
published
3.11
Yvonne Acker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Mayell
published
3.05
Sheila Newton
published
2.89
Beth Nielsen
published 3.5
Sally Gillooly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Fitzpatrick + Regina Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Fitzpatrick
39W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Beth Spinarski
117W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sara Summers
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Denise Corey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Virginia Higuchi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynne Farber
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Jane Thrailkill
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Yvonne Acker
125W–166L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sharon Mayell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Sheila Newton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Beth Nielsen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Sally Gillooly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.