Teams

Early Risers 18+

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 4.03 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-01vs Casual SetsLost 02
L#2 DoublesSean Parrish / Scott Bessey vs Leon Samuels / Chris Gussner1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSamuel Andrus vs Tayler Henrie3-6, 0-6
2026-06-24vs Miller TimeWon 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Henrie / Sean Parrish vs Joshua Harbst / Dave Keim6-1, 6-1
2026-06-22vs RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesBryan Escobedo / Sean Parrish vs Bernie Weldon / Nate Rawlinson6-4, 6-0
2026-06-17vs Over Served 18sLost 01
L#1 DoublesCory Mecham / Samuel Andrus vs Rick Roby / Mel Jackson4-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs Massive RacketsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCoby Arff vs Carter Anderson6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaden McCarney / Samuel Andrus vs Wallace Eastwood / Chad Anderson7-5, 6-0
2026-06-08vs The ShankersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSean Parrish / Nicholas Bell vs Duncan Mitchell / Matthew Li6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSamuel Andrus vs Chance Carlson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesSamuel Andrus vs Tom Michael6-3, 6-1
2026-06-01vs Shank'd It 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCoby Arff vs Darian Robbins3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSamuel Andrus vs Ryan van de Graaff4-6, 1-6
2026-05-27vs Rage Against the Ball MachineSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCoby Arff vs Stephen Heath6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRyan Henrie / Sean Parrish vs Keith Hudson / Harrison Chau4-6, 6-7
2026-05-20vs Net WorthWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Bessey / Samuel Andrus vs Scott Cahoon / Jake Riehemann7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Over Served 18s102451537392
2Early Risers 18+93392146450
3Rage Against the Ball Machine93372358510
4Shank'd It 4.075382251447
5MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces)66312968557
6Massive Rackets57293167535
7The Shankers48233785621
8Boise Bear Down012456113695

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Tim Trued
published 4.5
4.00
Robert Miranda
published 4
3.90
Cooper Simon
published 4
3.90
Nicholas Bell
published 4
3.89
Coby Arff
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Austin Avery
published 4
3.77
Roman Davis
published 4
3.77
Ryan Henrie
published 4
3.77
Bryan Escobedo
published 4
3.75
Jacob McCarney
published 4
3.75
Kaden McCarney
published 4
3.74
Randy Simon
published 4
3.71
Spencer Mumford
published 4
3.67
Scott Bessey
published 4
3.65
Cory Mecham
published 4
3.60
Jason Draper
published 4
3.50
Eric Walters
published 4
Samuel Andrus
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Sean Parrish
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Mecham + Roman Davis5359% games+3.5% vs expected
Jacob McCarney + Kaden McCarney6158% games+2.1% vs expected
Ryan Henrie + Bryan Escobedo5355% games+1.8% vs expected
Jason Draper + Cory Mecham7258% games+1.8% vs expected
Robert Miranda + Spencer Mumford16362% games−0.1% vs expected
Robert Miranda + Roman Davis6453% games−4.6% vs expected
Scott Bessey + Cory Mecham101549% games−4.7% vs expected
Jason Draper + Roman Davis51339% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tim Trued
100W–56L career · type D · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Robert Miranda
241W–112L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Cooper Simon
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Nicholas Bell
22W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Coby Arff
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Austin Avery
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Roman Davis
86W–76L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ryan Henrie
80W–46L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bryan Escobedo
93W–79L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jacob McCarney
16W–21L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Kaden McCarney
25W–19L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Randy Simon
26W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Spencer Mumford
60W–45L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Scott Bessey
58W–56L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Cory Mecham
62W–54L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Jason Draper
62W–71L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Eric Walters
64W–22L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Samuel Andrus
95W–66L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sean Parrish
41W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.