Teams

SB-LLW-Les Racquettes-Veronica Buck-Tomm

Adult 55 & Over - SB · Women 7.0 Combo Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-06vs Pershing-Sets on the Beach 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Daren Hillebrandt vs Christina Kensington / Penny Wolfe6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVeronica Buck-Tomm / Rosanne Marquis vs Susan Bender / Yin Segalman5-7, 3-6
2023-07-30vs Pershing-Sets on the Beach 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosanne Marquis / Inna Taranchenko vs Katherine Steele / Catherine Gautier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-23vs Pershing-Sets on the Beach 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaren Hillebrandt / Rosanne Marquis vs Penny Wolfe / Namita Patel6-0, 6-3
2023-07-09vs Pershing-Sets on the Beach 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Westlund / Inna Taranchenko vs Namita Patel / Penny Wolfe3-6, 4-6
2023-07-02vs Pershing-Sets on the Beach 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Cuttrell / Inna Taranchenko vs Namita Patel / Katherine Steele6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Inna Taranchenko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Daren Hillebrandt
published 3.5
3.08
Danuta McCall
published 3.5
3.06
Rosanne Marquis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Diana Cuttrell
published 3.5
Cristy Pugh
published 3
Beth Katz
published
Meichelle Arntz
published
Pamela Westlund
published
Rachael Stein
published
Veronica Buck-Tomm
published
Vicki Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inna Taranchenko + Diana Cuttrell6251% games+3.4% vs expected
Inna Taranchenko + Rosanne Marquis1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Inna Taranchenko
104W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Daren Hillebrandt
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Danuta McCall
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Rosanne Marquis
66W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Diana Cuttrell
14W–32L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Cristy Pugh
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Beth Katz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meichelle Arntz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Westlund
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Stein
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Veronica Buck-Tomm
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Collins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.