Teams

SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-19vs SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Loventhal (3:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesM Edelson / Edward Grader vs Eric Bowers / Michael Yniguez6-4, 6-2
2022-06-12vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Penn (3:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Christopher Penn / Theodore Gilmore2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-05vs SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Reyes (3:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJess Zlotnik / M Edelson vs Lorenzo Herrera / Anthony Reyes6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-08vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Penn (3:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJess Zlotnik / M Edelson vs Alex Fahrenthold / Alexis Akira Toda6-2, 6-4
2022-05-01vs SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Reyes (3:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Bob Ruane / Scott Atwood7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-10vs SD LLW 4.0 Mountain View/ GalanLost 01
L#1 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Antonio Hernandez / Benson Wong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Serge Glaeser
published
3.86
Andrew Gilcrest
published 4
3.83
Jess Zlotnik
published
3.81
Edward Grader
published 4
3.77
M Edelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Seth Hill
published
3.55
Larry Wagner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Hill + Edward Grader3357% games+4.2% vs expected
M Edelson + Jess Zlotnik314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Gilcrest + M Edelson303 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Gilcrest + Seth Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Serge Glaeser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Andrew Gilcrest
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jess Zlotnik
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Edward Grader
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
M Edelson
47W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Seth Hill
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Larry Wagner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.