Teams

CFong-DUR

2026 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Men Eve - Public

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over 3.0 Men Eve - Public
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CFong-DUR000000
2AHeymann-UNC000000
3JMyers-CHCC000000
4KMoore-HVCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Chris Moffitt
published 3
2.65
Marvin Davis
published
2.48
Cara Fong
published 2.5
2.43
Curtis Schulze
published 3
2.23
Daniel Wilkins
published 2.5
Philip Fong
published
TerRance Woodard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Moffitt
98W–102L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Marvin Davis
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Cara Fong
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
3
Curtis Schulze
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Daniel Wilkins
2W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Philip Fong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
TerRance Woodard
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.