Teams

Milton TC (Brandy Hoffmeister)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-24vs Westbrook (Todd Densmore)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesElisia van Scoter / Michael van Scoter vs Jane Russell / Brian Hardy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFernando Salinas / Liz North vs Elizabeth Beaver / Todd Densmore6-1, 6-2
2026-04-17vs Windermere (Patrick Ouzts)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesElissa Denham / Scott Denham vs Brad Holliday / Rhee McCallum3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoann Schuster / Fernando Salinas vs Sam Homsy / Amanda Ouzts6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael van Scoter / Elisia van Scoter vs Patrick Ouzts / Melissa Zeferjahn6-3, 6-1
2026-04-03vs Kingsley Estates (Kara O'Neill)*Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichael van Scoter / Elisia van Scoter vs Kara O'Neill / James Harris5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrandy Hoffmeister / Scott Denham vs Aldan O'Neill / Maxine Young6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLiz North / Francisco Martinez vs Tim Troncoso / Jessica Troncoso2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoann Schuster / Michael van Scoter vs Patricia McFadden / Jason McFadden6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs Concord Farms (Cheri Akselsen)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElissa Denham / Girish Shiva vs Mike Schick / Brittany Schick0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Martinez / Francisco Martinez vs Julie Gardiner / Kelsey Gardiner3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrandy Hoffmeister / Michael van Scoter vs Charles Davenport / Stephanie Dibert7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-13vs USTA Atlanta/Hong VuLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gantt / Fernando Salinas vs Thanh Nguyen / Tracy Nguyen3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Martinez / Michael van Scoter vs Ken Bui / Hieu Cao1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Denham / Colleen Dangoia vs Bailey Breeze / Bear Breeze0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Kelvin Rosa60171386
2USTA Atlanta/Hong Vu601539109
3E.E Robinson (Byunggwon Jeon)*5115310136
4Cambridge (Timothy O'Shea)*5114412133
5Governors Town Club (Bill Robinson)*429921161
6The Falls of Autry Mill (Josh Huang)*4281021148
7Milton TC (Brandy Hoffmeister)*339921161
8West Smyrna S&T (Vishwas Sinha)*2461226179
9Lifetime (Joan Lee)*2471126189
10Windermere (Patrick Ouzts)*2461226185
11Piedmont Park (Nyles Peterson)*1561225178
12Cambridge (Eric Shack)*1551328185
13Bitsy Grant (Nicole Mattei)*0651327174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Elisia van Scoter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Liz North
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Girish Shiva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael van Scoter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Francisco Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Joann Schuster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Brandy Hoffmeister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Michelle Helms
published
3.02
Fernando Salinas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Patricia Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Amanda Gantt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Elissa Denham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Colleen Dangoia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Scott Denham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve McDowell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael van Scoter + Elisia van Scoter4450% gamesnot enough data
Elissa Denham + Scott Denham2342% gamesnot enough data
Brandy Hoffmeister + Girish Shiva123 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Hoffmeister + Scott Denham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisia van Scoter
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Liz North
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Girish Shiva
2W–6L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Michael van Scoter
15W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Francisco Martinez
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Joann Schuster
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brandy Hoffmeister
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Michelle Helms
21W–35L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Fernando Salinas
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Patricia Martinez
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amanda Gantt
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Elissa Denham
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Colleen Dangoia
20W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.65
Scott Denham
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve McDowell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.