Teams

SFV - String Theory

2025 Adult 18 Weekday SFV · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-08vs SFV - Vamos DivasWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Schechter / Hannah Taylor vs Maarit Fenwick / Alicia Duran2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Friedman / Gina Hagen vs Wendy Brown / Teri Lorenzo7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Culhane / Cynthia Welles vs Michelle Yongyuan Wen / Christine Kim7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Nicolette Dallas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Tammy Sue Roberts
published
3.01
Susan Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Raymi Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Connie Benveniste
published 3.5
2.85
Lindsay Ignatczyk
published
2.84
Susan Schechter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Hope Jones
published
2.81
Helene Reinman
published
2.73
Wendy Nickerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Welles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Felice Densa
published
Holly Culhane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicolette Dallas + Wendy Williams3345% games−1.0% vs expected
Connie Benveniste + Helene Reinman0724% games−19.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicolette Dallas
59W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tammy Sue Roberts
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Raymi Schwartz
111W–147L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Connie Benveniste
2W–21L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Lindsay Ignatczyk
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Susan Schechter
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Hope Jones
3W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Helene Reinman
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.81
3
Wendy Nickerson
43W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cynthia Welles
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Felice Densa
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Williams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.