Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Smith/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-04vs GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Escudero/EPTC#2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephane Martel / Jean-denis Rivard vs Ernesto Garcia Padilla / Raymundo Soto2-6, 2-6
2026-05-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Smith / Jean-denis Rivard vs Jacob Saavedra / Jose Ulate6-3, 6-0
2026-03-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJean-denis Rivard vs Juan Pablo Becerra2-6, 5-7
2026-03-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJean-denis Rivard vs Zaphnath Jaramillo6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Danny Nassar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Alejandro Orozco
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Andres Intilia
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 28% · published 3.5
2.96
Carlos Reza
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Brendan Corrigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Drew Keels
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Eddie Nassar
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jean-denis Rivard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Mike Scott
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Octavio Corral
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sergio Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 24%, also #1 Singles 21% · published
Stephane Martel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tito Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Zachary Broome
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Nassar + Stephane Martel8846% gamesnot enough data
Danny Nassar + Stephane Martel2647% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Danny Nassar2539% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Orozco + Tito Herrera1543% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Juan Acevedo2346% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Tito Herrera1441% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Orozco + Juan Acevedo2347% gamesnot enough data
Stephane Martel + Tito Herrera044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Nassar
18W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alejandro Orozco
23W–40L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Andres Intilia
17W–20L career · 17 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Carlos Reza
19W–31L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Brendan Corrigan
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Drew Keels
13W–43L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eddie Nassar
37W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jean-denis Rivard
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
50W–82L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Scott
16W–36L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Octavio Corral
21W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio Castaneda
61W–81L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephane Martel
45W–84L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tito Herrera
14W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Broome
17W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.