Teams

K.Esham

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-12vs K.LevineSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Esham / Karen Bornhofen vs Kristen Levine / Laura Stanziale3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Douek vs Wendy Teeter6-3, 6-3
2023-05-05vs D.RusnakWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Karen Bornhofen vs Brittany Shumaker / Natalie Norris6-3, 6-3
2023-05-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Harris / Brandy Vannoy vs Chris Lickey / Erin Reade4-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs G.ScogginWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Best / Kristin Esham vs Mary Margaret Ross / Margaret Eller6-1, 6-0
2023-03-24vs K.Manooch2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Jocelyn Shaw vs Melissa Keener / Meredith Miller6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Michele Sullivan6-1, 6-1
2023-03-16vs D.RusnakWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Karen Bornhofen vs Karen Rayda / Dawn Rusnak6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Abigail Douek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.94
Emily Best
published
2.78
Jocelyn Shaw
published
2.70
Karen Bornhofen
published
2.58
Jean Merta
published
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Dalton Hunt
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Esham + Abigail Douek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abigail Douek
80W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Emily Best
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Jocelyn Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Karen Bornhofen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Jean Merta
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Dalton Hunt
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.