Teams

Chorazy

2025 Hampton Roads Combo · Hampton Roads Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-12vs Robinson - No deucebagsWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Ashman / Beth Kulas vs Kathryn Fraim / Polly Gellman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-12-11vs CaskillLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Natalie Ashman vs Melissa Johnson / Ashley Jessee6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-12-05vs CarrWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Skolnick / Katie Chorazy vs Paige Caporicci / Kelly Austin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChelsea Morton / Kelly Bellis vs Erica Ashcraft / Katie Donahue6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Willcox / Stephanie Bowen vs Georgia Carr / Terri Carter6-3, 6-4
2025-11-18vs '6 - 7Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Natalie Ashman vs Lisbet Hughes / Christine Eberhart6-2, 6-3
2025-11-14vs moyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Faye Downey vs Erica Sartwell / Chas Ferguson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-03vs CaskillLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Stephanie Bowen vs Shannon Halter / Stephanie Caskill2-6, 2-6
2025-10-29vs CarrWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Skolnick / Katie Chorazy vs Paige Caporicci / Katie Donahue6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAden Rose Glassman Beavers / Kelly Bellis vs Erica Ashcraft / Amy Ricciardella5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChelsea Morton / Natalie Ashman vs Carla McDonald / Toni Snider6-1, 6-4
2025-10-21vs Robinson - No deucebagsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Chorazy / Beth Kulas vs Kimberly Havener / Lauren Kiger6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-30vs moyerLost 01
L#1 DoublesFaye Downey / Beth Kulas vs Kelsey O'Hanlon / Grayson Kellam7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Anne Randolph Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Beth Skolnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Beth Kulas
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Aden Rose Glassman Beavers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Chelsea Morton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Caroline Willcox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Kelly Bellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Katie Chorazy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Faye Downey
published
2.80
Stephanie Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Natalie Ashman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Megan Bradshaw
published
2.46
Allison Beasley
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Bellis + Katie Chorazy3456% games+0.5% vs expected
Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Randolph Brown
8W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Aden Rose Glassman Beavers
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chelsea Morton
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Willcox
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kelly Bellis
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Katie Chorazy
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Faye Downey
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Stephanie Bowen
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Natalie Ashman
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Megan Bradshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
3
Allison Beasley
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.