Teams

CPeterson-HVCC

2025 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-03vs PDavis-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Matalaba Napier6-2, 6-0
2025-06-17vs JORegan-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Connie Brown6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMichelle Koeneke vs Jan ORegan6-1, 6-1
2025-06-10vs DBaker-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Meta Kuehn7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichelle Koeneke vs Barbara Wilhelm6-4, 6-4
2025-06-06vs JORegan-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Glenda Dinyari6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Koeneke vs Dana Powers6-2, 6-0
2025-06-03vs YDeaver-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Yolanda Deaver5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-29vs JPermutt-CHTCLost 01
L#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Joelle Permutt6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs DBaker-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Meta Kuehn7-5, 6-1
2025-05-18vs PDavis-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesMichelle Koeneke vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-1, 6-1
2025-05-15vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Donna Spero2-6, 1-6
2025-05-06vs MLong-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Anna Fadel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Koeneke vs Richelle Robinson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 3
3.03
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
2.98
Michelle Koeneke
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.96
Joanie Preyer
published
2.72
Elizabeth Yancy
published
2.71
Caroline Carrico
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Michelle Koeneke
61W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Joanie Preyer
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Elizabeth Yancy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Caroline Carrico
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.