Teams

RCCB - Vickers

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs Kiwi - WyandWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Devlin Deveney vs Heather Boesch / Julianne Moore3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Viera Regional Park - HeltonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Devlin Deveney vs Katharine Polvino / Nancy Hastings6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-25vs Kiwanis - PressLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Maryanne Donigan vs Becky Press / Laura Kutryb6-7, 6-7
2026-06-18vs Fee - DeschaineWon 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Keeney / Maryanne Donigan vs Susan Deschaine / Marilyn Annis6-1, 6-3
2026-06-11vs EFSC - BrunkalaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Brenda Tarquinio vs Mary Failla / Linda Carrillo6-1, 7-6
2026-05-28vs EGYC - LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesTeresa Keeney / Lindsay Nichols vs Kerry Sutton / Denise Stanley1-6, 0-6
2026-05-14vs Viera Regional Park - HeltonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Devlin Deveney vs Katharine Polvino / Nancy Hastings6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Angela Duckworth
published 3.5
3.41
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
published 3.5
3.20
Diana Hayslip
published 3.5
3.10
Devlin Deveney
published 3
3.01
Brittany Reiter
published 3
3.00
Maryanne Donigan
published
2.94
Melissa Vickers
published
2.89
Lindsay Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Erin Schlitts
published
2.75
Brenda Tarquinio
published 3
Teresa Keeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Schlitts + Melissa Vickers5068% games+8.9% vs expected
Brenda Tarquinio + Melissa Vickers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Duckworth
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Diana Hayslip
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Devlin Deveney
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Brittany Reiter
11W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Maryanne Donigan
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Lindsay Nichols
33W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Erin Schlitts
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–8L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Teresa Keeney
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.