Teams

Bettinger/Kraska

2022 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Women Fall Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesKim Hunt vs Cheryl Scott6-4, 6-4
2022-09-23vs LALIBERTE 3.5 18+ singlesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKim Hunt vs Heidi Gingerich6-3, 6-0
2022-08-12vs LALIBERTE 3.5 18+ singlesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKim Hunt vs Danielle Laliberte6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
published 3.5
3.40
April Moss
published 3.5
3.33
Kara Jacobs
published
3.26
Cindy Sumner
published 3.5
Andrea Pollina
published 3.5
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
2.73
Aimee Largen
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
April Moss
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Sumner
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Pollina
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Aimee Largen
15W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.