Teams

CCTA55/Horan/Belfair

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Adult Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nancy DiGiacomo
published
Anne Chudnofsky
published 3.5
3.14
Deborah Harrington
published 3.5
3.10
Janice Howse
published
3.04
Margaret Kloet
published
2.86
Elizabeth Horan
published 3
2.64
Erin Kropski
published 3
2.50
Nancy Kuykendall
published
Kathy Freer
published
Ruth Knockeart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Harrington + Nancy DiGiacomo6357% games+8.1% vs expected
Erin Kropski + Margaret Kloet4160% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Horan + Ruth Knockeart134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Freer + Ruth Knockeart123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Chudnofsky + Ruth Knockeart213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Horan + Janice Howse033 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Kloet + Janice Howse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy DiGiacomo
17W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Chudnofsky
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Harrington
30W–28L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Janice Howse
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Margaret Kloet
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Horan
16W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Erin Kropski
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Nancy Kuykendall
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kathy Freer
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Knockeart
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.