Teams

Parker/Murfreesboro

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Murfreesboro · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-17vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Parker / Debbie Miller vs Colleen Sentz / Carole Harry6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Steger / Lesly Todesco vs Carla Himpelmann / Barbara Kendall6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVicki Jacobs / Becky Schuler vs Barbara Tempkins / Pamela Smith6-7, 1-6
2026-08-11vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky Morgan / Kathy McCabe vs Carolyn Roberts / Lana Snellgrove6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Miller / Barbara Parker vs Carla Himpelmann / Barbara Kendall1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVicki Jacobs / Becky Schuler vs Pamela Smith / Barbara Tempkins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroLost 02
L#1 DoublesBecky Schuler / Barbara Parker vs Carla Himpelmann / Barbara Kendall4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Steger / Joan Arney vs Pamela Smith / Barbara Tempkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Jacobs / Becky Schuler vs Barbara Long / Judy Hobbs6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Arney / Lesly Todesco vs Carla Himpelmann / Carole Harry1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Parker / Debbie Miller vs Ann Manning / Beverly Soapes6-1, 7-6
2026-07-23vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Schuler / Vicki Jacobs vs Beverly Soapes / Ann Manning6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Miller / Barbara Parker vs Barbara Long / Carole Harry6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBecky Morgan / Kathy McCabe vs Carla Himpelmann / Barbara Kendall1-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs Hobbs/MurfreesboroSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Steger / Barbara Parker vs Ann Manning / Beverly Soapes4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Arney / Lesly Todesco vs Carolyn Roberts / Colleen Sentz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Susan Steger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Becky Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Lesly Todesco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Joan Arney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Kathy McCabe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Becky Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Steger
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Becky Schuler
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Parker
17W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lesly Todesco
11W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Joan Arney
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kathy McCabe
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
3.5
Becky Morgan
2W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.