Teams

DB/Mearns

2026 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over- Summer · 5.0 Mixed 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-24vs 300/Redding-WilsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndy Sakalla / Gabriela Ladd vs Marly Wilson / Ben Clark6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMehmet Genc / Mariselis Luna vs Julie Redding / Nor Chalouhi2-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs 300/Redding-WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorey Mearns / Gabriela Ladd vs Megan Mcvay / Erik Black6-4, 7-5
2026-08-18vs 300/Redding-WilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCorey Mearns / Gabriela Patino vs Mary Szoka / Justice Diamond2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Sakalla / Gabriela Ladd vs Denise Krigbaum / John Krigbaum7-6, 6-3
2026-08-15vs 300/Redding-WilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCorey Mearns / Gabriela Patino vs Justice Diamond / Mary Szoka4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Sakalla / Gabriela Ladd vs Bryan Jake-schoffman / Kim Smith5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-08vs 300/Redding-WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMehmet Genc / Gabriela Patino vs Julie Redding / Erik Black3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabriela Ladd / Elvis Gutierrez vs Mary Szoka / Justice Diamond0-6, 0-6
2026-07-25vs 300/Redding-WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCorey Mearns / Lauren Atkins vs Martin Estey / Leandra Combass1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Sakalla / Gabriela Ladd vs Denise Krigbaum / John Krigbaum6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMariselis Luna / Elvis Gutierrez vs Julie Redding / Ryan Gilbert4-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs 300/Redding-WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGabriela Patino / Mehmet Genc vs Martin Estey / Marly Wilson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Atkins / Andy Sakalla vs Justice Diamond / Mary Szoka2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1300/Redding-Wilson3081452
2DB/Mearns03181697

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Mehmet Genc
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Andy Sakalla
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.23
Corey Mearns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gabriela Ladd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gabriela Patino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mariselis Luna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Ladd + Andy Sakalla404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Mehmet Genc
44W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Andy Sakalla
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Corey Mearns
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Gabriela Ladd
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriela Patino
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariselis Luna
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.