Teams

MEA RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs NJ YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJacquie Prescott / Kristen Royer vs Kathy Hardin / Erica Flora2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Nicole Cotta1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Morone / Samantha MacMillan vs Julie Steven / Jennifer Livingston1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesVera Moreno-Hamm vs Zhenzhen Yu7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-22vs RMTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnn Roth / Samantha MacMillan vs Lori Mason / Chantal Kovach7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesVera Moreno-Hamm vs Christy Roney4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Boennighausen / Nicole Duster vs Patti Dietz / Rebecca Upthegrove7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaire Lochridge / Devan Haas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-15vs BRMST SILVERWon 41
W#1 DoublesJacquie Prescott / Kristen Royer vs Sharla Prom / Renee Gracey7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Sarah Hertzenberg6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMiriam McCarty / Wendy Morone vs Shelli Fazzini / Cynthia Burchell7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSamantha MacMillan vs Alejandra Sullivan6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Duster / Claire Lochridge vs Lori Claussen / Karen Gallo0-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs BCC GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Kristen Royer vs Lauren Christin / Sarah Mills7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVera Moreno-Hamm / Susan Boennighausen vs Linda Mounce / Xenia Rutherford6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Kirsten Eldridge6-2, 6-2
2023-05-01vs CVTA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Royer / Jacquie Prescott vs Nancy Johnson / Peggy Morgan6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Kim Pettingill-Long6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Duster / Claire Lochridge vs Katharine Owocki / Karen Hawley6-1, 6-0
2023-04-24vs NJ PURPLEWon 31
L#1 DoublesSusan Boennighausen / Kristen Royer vs Molly Burke / Allison Abrams0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Katherine Ashley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Ann Roth vs Mary Alberts / Diane Hedberg6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVera Moreno-Hamm / Wendy Morone vs Nancy Santmyer / Holly McClure6-2, 7-6
2023-04-17vs CVTA ORANGEWon 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Boennighausen / Kristen Royer vs Tia Bach / Toni Cowern6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Cristina Torres-Machi7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Jacquie Prescott vs Jodi Ansell / Liz Griffin6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesClaire Lochridge vs Kate Clary2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Duster / Wendy Morone vs Sara Remington / Diane Engel1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Vera Moreno-Hamm
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Susan Boennighausen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Kristen Royer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Cynthia Shick
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.83
Samantha MacMillan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Claire Lochridge
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Ann Roth
published 3
2.75
Jacquie Prescott
published 3
Devan Haas
published 3
2.66
Wendy Morone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Miriam McCarty
published
2.53
Nicole Duster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacquie Prescott + Ann Roth7363% games+12.9% vs expected
Samantha MacMillan + Ann Roth2353% games+9.3% vs expected
Jacquie Prescott + Susan Boennighausen3552% games+0.3% vs expected
Nicole Duster + Samantha MacMillan1540% games−1.0% vs expected
Wendy Morone + Samantha MacMillan5357% gamesnot enough data
Samantha MacMillan + Susan Boennighausen6162% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Royer + Susan Boennighausen3352% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Morone + Vera Moreno-Hamm404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vera Moreno-Hamm
40W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.08
3
Susan Boennighausen
58W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Kristen Royer
61W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Cynthia Shick
54W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Samantha MacMillan
39W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Claire Lochridge
35W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Roth
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Jacquie Prescott
38W–45L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Devan Haas
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Wendy Morone
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Miriam McCarty
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Nicole Duster
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.