Teams

OC Sparkly Powerpuff Squad

2026 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-22vs Bad News BunniesLost 01
L#1 DoublesEstella Berg / Elsie Crowninshield vs Sonavie Ong / Mamta Patel4-6, 4-6
2026-08-21vs Kuliouou Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine KIm / Lianne Poppinga vs Bonnie Moy / Miho May6-2, 6-4
2026-08-08vs OC BestiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeiko Kratky / Julie Chang vs Ani Dinkova / Novajocymarie Nishida6-2, 7-5
2026-08-02vs LUV-LUVLost 01
L#1 DoublesLianne Poppinga / Estella Berg vs Sharon Vidal / Rumiko Wong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-01vs LUV-LUVWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Chang / Keiko Kratky vs Debby Shin / Sharon Vidal6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-25vs JustLuvTennis 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Chang / Estella Berg vs Genelynne Jian / Yuko Omorai6-4, 7-6
2026-07-12vs Doubles DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine KIm / Keiko Kratky vs Shana Suzuki / Darlene Chang6-7, 0-6
2026-07-05vs Bad News BunniesLost 01
L#1 DoublesElsie Crowninshield / Lianne Poppinga vs Mamta Patel / Krisna Suryanata6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Kuliouou Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine KIm / Keiko Kratky vs Akiko Ooi / Miho May6-1, 6-2
2026-06-21vs OC BestiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEstella Berg / Lianne Poppinga vs Novajocymarie Nishida / Lydia Yabsley5-7, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LUV-LUV5353764
2OC Sparkly Powerpuff Squad5353877
3Bad News Bunnies4343753
4OC Besties44441190
5JustLuvTennis 3.016161383
6Kuliouou Double Trouble17171596

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Julie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Estella Berg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Christine KIm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Keiko Kratky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Lianne Poppinga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elsie Crowninshield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Estella Berg + Lianne Poppinga3347% games+0.9% vs expected
Elsie Crowninshield + Estella Berg1537% games−0.1% vs expected
Lianne Poppinga + Keiko Kratky3641% games−4.4% vs expected
Christine KIm + Lianne Poppinga314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Chang
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Estella Berg
32W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Christine KIm
23W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Keiko Kratky
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lianne Poppinga
20W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Elsie Crowninshield
31W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.