Magee/Esmaeilpour/LR

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Schedule3 played

2024-09-28vs Crum/Springdale/RebWon 2–1

L#1 DoublesTim Gunter / Ricky Holder vs Mike Horsman / Val Robison2-6, 1-6

W#2 DoublesPete Owens / Dana Bennett vs Jon Adams / Robert Tommey7-5, 6-2

W#3 DoublesCarey Norris / Don Dobbins vs Terry Murphy / Kevin McCotter6-1, 6-2

2024-09-28vs DGarretson/LR/RebLost 1–2

W#1 DoublesTim Gunter / William Hawkins vs David Robinson / Bobby Ring6-4, 6-4

L#2 DoublesCarey Norris / Dana Bennett vs Edward Barbot / Mike Ritch5-7, 3-6

L#3 DoublesElliot Esmaeilpour / Kevin Dugan vs John Bakalekos / Doug Williams5-7, 3-6

2024-09-27vs Wallman/Bella Vista/KTCLost 1–2

L#1 DoublesWilliam Hawkins / Don Dobbins vs Peter Ritchie / David Zago3-6, 4-6

W#2 DoublesElliot Esmaeilpour / Kevin Dugan vs John Zapp / Kevin Shanahan6-3, 7-6

L#3 DoublesPete Owens / Ricky Holder vs Jim Denno / Stuart Vess6-3, 2-6, 0-1

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94

William Hawkins

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

2.90

Don Dobbins

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

2.86

Pete Owens

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

2.77

Kevin Dugan

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

2.64

Carey Norris

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.60

Elliot Esmaeilpour

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

2.59

Tim Gunter

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Ricky Holder

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Dugan + Elliot Esmaeilpour	1–3	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

William Hawkins

1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024

<1%66%34%

2.94

—

Don Dobbins

16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024

76%24%<1%

2.90

—

Pete Owens

15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024

<1%83%17%

2.86

—

Kevin Dugan

8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024

3%92%5%

2.77

Carey Norris

8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024

15%84%1%

2.64

—

Elliot Esmaeilpour

7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024

24%76%<1%

2.60

—

Tim Gunter

4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024

27%73%<1%

2.59

—

Ricky Holder

4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.