Teams

JMiles (Life Time)

2022 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-08vs JMu (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Miles / Ofelia Claxton vs Carrie Letorney / Lisa Cook6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Jacqueline Cronin vs Penelope Powell / Alyse Kelly-Jones3-6, 2-6
2022-10-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Smith-Shaw / Linda Burks-Adams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-22vs JMu (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Holwager / Ofelia Claxton vs Joyce Mu / Maria Solorzano2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarrie Harris / Linda Burks-Adams vs Penelope Powell / Karen Summers7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-08vs JMu (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Miles / Ofelia Claxton vs Maria Solorzano / Alyse Kelly-Jones7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs JMu (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Deborah Smith-Shaw vs Penelope Powell / Joanne Ward6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Miles / Linda Burks-Adams vs Maria Solorzano / Joyce Mu1-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs JMu (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Elizabeth Myers vs Carrie Letorney / Penelope Powell5-7, 3-6
2022-08-21vs JMu (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Cory Mondshane vs Carrie Letorney / Maria Solorzano5-5
2022-08-18vs JMu (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Smith-Shaw / Ofelia Claxton vs Joanne Ward / Maria Solorzano6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Elizabeth Myers vs LARA Ferguson / Alyse Kelly-Jones6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Ofelia Claxton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Hilda Austin
published 3.5
2.83
Laura Difraia
published
2.80
2.75
Elizabeth Myers
published 3
2.69
Jennifer Miles
published
2.52
Linda Burks-Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Deborah Smith-Shaw
published 2.5
Cory Mondshane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Myers + Catherine Holwager5157% games+0.2% vs expected
Laura Difraia + Elizabeth Myers044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ofelia Claxton
126W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hilda Austin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Laura Difraia
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Catherine Holwager
7W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Elizabeth Myers
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Jennifer Miles
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Linda Burks-Adams
41W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Deborah Smith-Shaw
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%64%36%
2.45
Cory Mondshane
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.