Teams

3.5 MVTC Ballers&Brew W40FD

2024 FALL Adult 40 & Over DAYTIME · 40 & Over Day 3.5 Thur

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-16vs 3.5 DMCC Hot Shots W40FDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeanette Jones / Deirdre Bartels vs Kristina Kehm / Cynthia Kolander6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSynette Williamson vs Terese Shanley2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJean Abrams / Trish Maland vs Cheryl Jolley / Susan Levy5-7, 4-3
2023-11-09vs 3.5 PTC Jaquess W40FDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Bartels / Monique Groothuizen vs Lorna Jaquess / Terri Sakata6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSynette Williamson vs Jody Steele6-2, 6-4
2023-11-02vs 3.5 PTC Open Team W40FDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSynette Williamson / Trish Maland vs Jami Gamez / Amber Bersi3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Laurie Meidt6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJeanette Jones / Karen Yore vs Lori Therrien / Sanya Hunsucker6-2, 6-0
2023-10-26vs 3.5 DMCC Hot Shots W40FDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Bartels / Monique Groothuizen vs Kristina Kehm / Cynthia Kolander2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSynette Williamson vs Mary Lesman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Caporali / Barbara Bloom vs Connie Hines / Terese Shanley1-6, 0-6
2023-10-19vs 3.5 PTC Jaquess W40FDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanette Jones / Pamela Kinney vs Lori Ploetner / Nobuko Tako6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Aileen Kennedy2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJean Abrams / Trish Maland vs Lorna Jaquess / Angeline Haase6-2, 6-3
2023-10-12vs 3.5 PTC Open Team W40FDWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Bloom / Jeanette Jones vs Lisa Fujii / Jami Gamez6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Kathleen Benton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Yore / Susan Caporali vs Kathlina Phillips / Sylvia Sussman6-3, 6-4
2023-10-05vs 3.5 DMCC Hot Shots W40FDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanette Jones / Monique Groothuizen vs Kristina Kehm / Cynthia Kolander6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Terese Shanley6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Caporali / Maryellen O'Keefe vs Cheryl Jolley / Pamela Alexander1-6, 2-6
2023-09-28vs 3.5 PTC Jaquess W40FDWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Bloom / Jeanette Jones vs Diane Allard / Terri Sakata2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Nobuko Tako4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Abrams / Karen Yore vs Angeline Haase / Lorna Jaquess6-1, 6-2
2023-09-21vs 3.5 PTC Open Team W40FDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Yore / Barbara Bloom vs Amber Bersi / Jami Gamez1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Bartels vs Lisa Fujii6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Caporali / Maryellen O'Keefe vs Kathleen Benton / Sanya Hunsucker7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40 & Over Day 3.5 Thur
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13.5 DMCC Hot Shots W40FD8118921207
23.5 MVTC Ballers&Brew W40FD63161124217
33.5 PTC Jaquess W40FD36131433239
43.5 PTC Open Team W40FD1872041277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Deirdre Bartels
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Barbara Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Synette Williamson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Pamela Kinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Abrams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanette Jones
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Karen Yore
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Maryellen O'Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Monique Groothuizen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Caporali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trish Maland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monique Groothuizen + Deirdre Bartels16860% games+7.9% vs expected
Pamela Kinney + Jeanette Jones8259% games+6.6% vs expected
Karen Yore + Jean Abrams314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deirdre Bartels
35W–18L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Barbara Bloom
85W–143L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
Synette Williamson
56W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
Pamela Kinney
198W–118L career · 1 line in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jean Abrams
67W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeanette Jones
97W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Yore
66W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryellen O'Keefe
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monique Groothuizen
66W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Caporali
73W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trish Maland
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.