Teams

LA - The Tough Asks

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-10vs LA - Balls DeepLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Geismer / Liz Millikin vs Alexandra Sann / Eunice Lakis2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKristina Woo vs Portia Furst3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeah Linder / Sasha Silver vs Alison Cole-kelly / Gloria Hann3-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs LA - MulhollandLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisha Brooks / Leah Linder vs Susan Carter Hall / Chi Kephart0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKristina Woo vs Beth Gensinger7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Levy / Stephanie Fowler Ziese vs Lauren Morphew / Cassandra Jean Amell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Daniel Kahana
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
2.74
Daniela Weiss
published 3
2.39
Sarah Geismer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Kristina Woo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Liz Millikin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alexandra Levy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Beth Schwartz
published 2.5
2.14
Leah Linder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.14
Lisha Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Sasha Silver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Hannah Fidell
published
2.12
Tchaiko Omawale
published
Molly Breeskin
published
Stephanie Fowler Ziese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Geismer + Liz Millikin224 matchesnot enough data
Liz Millikin + Leah Linder134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Kahana
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.56
3
Daniela Weiss
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Sarah Geismer
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
Kristina Woo
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Liz Millikin
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Alexandra Levy
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Chang-warwick
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Beth Schwartz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Linder
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Lisha Brooks
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sasha Silver
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Hannah Fidell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Tchaiko Omawale
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Molly Breeskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Fowler Ziese
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.