Teams

MEccleston (Lifetime)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-26vs JWaleski (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLizette Conover / Gayathri Dharmalingam vs Christine Shultz / Christina Hill4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-09-12vs TWalker (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLizette Conover / Gayathri Dharmalingam vs Lauren Mulligan / Amy Yancey4-6, 2-6
2022-09-01vs VWade/AWiethoff (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Holland / Robin Estridge vs Barbara Moysaenko / Kimberly Fore0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLizette Conover / Leigh Clinard vs Amie Caudle / Lori Holcombe2-6, 2-6
2022-08-09vs SBeard (Charlotte Country Club)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLesly Carlton / Lizette Conover vs Stacy Beard / Kathryn Thigpen6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Latha Baddigam
published 3.5
3.41
Melissa Eccleston
published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer McNally
published
3.28
Julie Linder
published
Robin Estridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Warpula
published
3.10
Lizette Conover
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Alexis Galbreath
published 3.5
2.95
Lesly Carlton
published
2.83
Laura Difraia
published
2.58
Debra Holland
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer McNally + Melissa Eccleston7750% games+5.0% vs expected
Melissa Eccleston + Latha Baddigam7359% games+0.5% vs expected
Jennifer McNally + Latha Baddigam123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Latha Baddigam
64W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Melissa Eccleston
37W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
Jennifer McNally
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Julie Linder
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Robin Estridge
27W–58L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Warpula
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3
Lizette Conover
53W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Alexis Galbreath
7W–30L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Lesly Carlton
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Laura Difraia
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Debra Holland
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Gayathri Dharmalingam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.