Teams

NorthWestie Besties

Spring Adult 18 & Over Lone Star (Non-Adv) · Lonestar Ladies 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs Slice GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Frost / Kate Bossange vs Renna Berman / Carolina Molfetta8-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gorrick / Casey Fisher vs Becky Best / Shannon Peris8-1
W#3 DoublesEmma Ross / Michele Scott vs Emily Hayes / Mai Ferrara8-3
2026-03-21vs Deuce QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Bossange / Rachael Shimek vs Inbal Kleinerman / Sezer Isuf8-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gorrick / Theresa Tarantino vs Angela Broxterman / Martha Coerver8-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Scott / Emma Ross vs Eileen Steinberger / Maria Pantaleoni5-8
2026-03-21vs Served and ConfusedWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachael Shimek / Julie Frost vs Bethany Pendleton / Rachelle Campbell8-5
L#2 DoublesTheresa Tarantino / Casey Fisher vs Laura Merino / Tracy Slappey-scott6-8
W#3 DoublesMichele Scott / Emma Ross vs Alison Pendleton / Alexandra Hickey8-0
2026-03-21vs Westoverhead SmashersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Frost / Kate Bossange vs Belinda Gallagher / Alison Means8-1
W#2 DoublesRachael Shimek / Elizabeth Gorrick vs Marianne Stout / Shay Webb8-2
W#3 DoublesTheresa Tarantino / Casey Fisher vs January Pfiester / Lizaveta Matsiushonak9-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lonestar Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Julie Frost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Kate Bossange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Kate Reddy
published
2.33
Elizabeth Gorrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Emma Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Rachael Shimek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Theresa Tarantino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Casey Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Fisher + Theresa Tarantino2346% games−3.7% vs expected
Julie Frost + Kate Bossange7074% gamesnot enough data
Rachael Shimek + Kate Reddy4167% gamesnot enough data
Julie Frost + Elizabeth Gorrick224 matchesnot enough data
Casey Fisher + Elizabeth Gorrick123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Frost + Rachael Shimek303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Frost
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.57
Kate Bossange
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.57
Kate Reddy
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.54
2.5
Elizabeth Gorrick
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Emma Ross
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Rachael Shimek
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Theresa Tarantino
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Casey Fisher
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.