Teams

Team 16 WGCC Slice Girls

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Team 2 Love & Deuces 3.0 SummerWon 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Freda Moore6-0, 6-0
2025-07-08vs Team 8 Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesSeema Dabas / Kerri Thomas vs Erin Fisher / Rene Wilkinson6-4, 5-4
2025-07-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Elizabeth Krial6-0, 6-0
2025-06-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Patricia Jordan6-0, 6-2
2025-06-24vs Team 18 Rapid FireWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Parker / Kerri Thomas vs Shiva Shahabadi / Amy Polly6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Varsha Chandra6-4, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kerri Thomas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Sarah Ruppert
published
2.87
Brooke Daniels
published 3
2.83
Maureen Petron
published
2.81
Jane Wishneff
published
2.79
Greta Kohlhagen
published 3
Cristin Finkel
published 3
2.74
Erica Bailey
published 3
2.65
Erin Parker
published 3
2.64
Taryn Walpole
published
2.56
Sarah Trimmer
published
2.55
Seema Dabas
published
Lindsay Egge
published
Susie Luongo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Parker + Maureen Petron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kerri Thomas
99W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.63
Sarah Ruppert
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
3
Brooke Daniels
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
Maureen Petron
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Jane Wishneff
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Greta Kohlhagen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Cristin Finkel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Erica Bailey
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Erin Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Taryn Walpole
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Sarah Trimmer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
2.56
Seema Dabas
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
Lindsay Egge
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Luongo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.