Teams

Goodman/Earley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-08vs Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 14
L#1 DoublesAnn Martel / Kristi Collins vs Jessica Bair-Epps / Lauren Ivey2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Samantha Harlow1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDabney Porter / Beverly Tuttle vs Katie Shane / Martha Benbow1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesHannah Higgins vs Sally Eagleton1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Brittany Furr vs Rosemary Dedman / Ann Evans6-2, 6-2
2025-04-24vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 05
L#1 DoublesKristi Collins / Beverly Tuttle vs Nancy Benda / Kate Meiners0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDabney Porter vs Allison Johnson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Brittany Furr vs Denise Speight / Melissa Agner2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Jane Owens3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka vs Ginny Lewis / Lindsay Ray5-7, 3-6
2025-04-17vs Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 14
L#1 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Virginia Easley vs Jessica Bair-Epps / Lauren Ivey4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Higgins vs Samantha Harlow0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Goodman / Kristi Collins vs Kelly Lombardino / Martha Benbow2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrittany Furr vs Sally Eagleton0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka vs Claire Parsons / Ann Evans6-1, 6-2
2025-04-03vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Ann Martel vs Nancy Benda / Jane Owens4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Higgins vs Sarah Stafford1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka vs Jami Heller / Kate Meiners7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Nancy Cobb1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesApril Wilson / Virginia Easley vs Alejandra Hernandez Medel / Adriana Hernandez6-2, 6-4
2025-03-13vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesRhyssa Earley / Joy Martin vs Jami Heller / Kate Meiners3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRolinde Cleyman vs Nancy Cobb4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia Easley / Kristi Collins vs Melissa Agner / Lindsay Ray6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Martel vs Jane Owens2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Melissa Goodman vs Tiffany Brown / Thanawan Hahn0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Brittany Furr
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Kristi Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Sayaka Matsuoka
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Rhyssa Earley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Virginia Easley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Beverly Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
April Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Dabney Porter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.73
Yukari Matsuoka
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Hannah Higgins
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Ann Martel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Melissa Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Rolinde Cleyman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhyssa Earley + Brittany Furr6651% games−0.0% vs expected
Sayaka Matsuoka + Yukari Matsuoka111248% games−2.1% vs expected
Melissa Goodman + Joy Martin3538% games−6.3% vs expected
Beverly Tuttle + Dabney Porter3640% games−7.0% vs expected
Dabney Porter + Kristi Collins134 matchesnot enough data
Joy Martin + Rhyssa Earley033 matchesnot enough data
Rhyssa Earley + Virginia Easley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittany Furr
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Kristi Collins
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Sayaka Matsuoka
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Rhyssa Earley
24W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Virginia Easley
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
April Wilson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Dabney Porter
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Hannah Higgins
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Ann Martel
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Rolinde Cleyman
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.