Teams

PPL CLARK

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-26vs MCL BAYNESplit 22
L#1 DoublesKeith Clark / Jeremy SoRelle vs Nicholas Alexander / Marvin Suggs7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Camerlin / Drew Wieland vs Colin Bailey / Will Iheanacho7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBob Mueller vs Kyle Brown2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Collins / Chris Davis vs Raybourne Burt / Gaspar Hinojosa6-2, 6-4
2025-04-21vs DTPC VISCAFELost 05
L#1 DoublesKeith Clark / Gregory Collins vs Brad Gossett / Josh Morgan3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuis Santana vs Lawrence Williams4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Wieland / Greg Wawryszczuk vs Carlos Contreras / Billy Nguyen5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBob Mueller vs Andrew Olson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Weaver / Thomas Weaver vs John Stewart / Dillon Jensen2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Bob Mueller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Aaron Kettering
published 3.5
3.23
Luis Santana
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Terry Morawski
published
3.16
Gregory Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Keith Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Jeremy SoRelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alvin Adamson
published 3
2.61
Douglas Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Drew Wieland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Wawryszczuk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Camerlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
THOMAS SHOLLAR
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Clark + Jeremy SoRelle4346% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bob Mueller
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Aaron Kettering
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Luis Santana
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Terry Morawski
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Gregory Collins
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Keith Clark
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jeremy SoRelle
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Alvin Adamson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Weaver
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Drew Wieland
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Wawryszczuk
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Camerlin
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
THOMAS SHOLLAR
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.