Teams

McMullen Halm

2025 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 M Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-23vs Seminole Lake Dsa 3.5 MLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Paul Solorzano vs James Bettencourt / Folayan Fatade2-6, 2-6
2025-03-15vs Seminole Lake Dsa 3.5 MLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Andrew DePasquale vs Kevin Dooling / Thomas Holdstein3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Mony Rodon vs James Bettencourt / Andres Rodrigues Mortimer3-6, 4-6
2025-03-01vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/18&Over3.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Jamie Dennis / Steven Friedman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-15vs SPTC Holliday 3.5 MWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Andrew DePasquale vs Lawrence Allen / Daniel McKinney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Aidan Snee / Jamie Dennis4-6, 4-6
2025-01-11vs SPTC Holliday 3.5 MWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs John Stone / WAYNE SMITH6-0, 6-1
2025-01-04vs Feather Sound DikmenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Halm / Andrew DePasquale vs Austin Reeves / Ray Baker6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Johnny Fung
published
3.44
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.44
Joseph Flaherty
published
3.43
Jeffery Erskine
published
3.43
3.32
Mony Rodon
published
3.31
Andrew DePasquale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.24
YOUNES HAMDI
published
3.02
Paul Solorzano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Christopher Patterson5158% games+4.4% vs expected
Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Fung
26W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Brandon Halm
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Joseph Flaherty
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Jeffery Erskine
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Mony Rodon
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Christopher Patterson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
YOUNES HAMDI
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.