Teams

MCampbell (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-09vs AWhalan/KMartin (Sardis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesArliss Day / Sarah Krenz vs Katie Crosby / Avra Reddy2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLindsay Smith / Katie van Valkinburgh vs Colleen Hickman / Anne Whalan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVan ONeill / Palak Merchant vs Cynthia Hoover / Kathryn Martin0-6, 2-6
2025-09-30vs LPinzon/LDifazio (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandria McNulty / Sarah Krenz vs Susan McDonald / Kristina Cancian3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Smith / Katie van Valkinburgh vs Melanie Rebosa / Cherie Wright7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristy Haseltine / Margaret Campbell vs Jennifer Siddall / Heather Enlow-Novitsky4-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs ASunden (Raintree)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Early / Margaret Campbell vs Amber Brannon / Sybil Cioffi2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandria McNulty / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs Bonnie Sheppard / Mindy Zimmerman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSydney Gaston / Mitchell Kelling vs Caroline Cox / Katrina Richards6-4, 6-2
2025-09-11vs KHart/RDrees (Blakeney)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSydney Gaston / Katie van Valkinburgh vs Smita Thakur / Rachel Grantham2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Koppel-Dobbs / Kathleen Early vs Adrianna Graves / Rosalie ORourke3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPalak Merchant / Kim Gissy vs Michele Olsen / Carrie Childs7-6, 6-4
2025-09-04vs AWhalan/KMartin (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesArliss Day / Van ONeill vs Amie Caudle / Colleen Hickman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Haseltine / Palak Merchant vs Mary Laird Garrison / Jessica Outterson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsay Smith / Kim Gissy vs Sarah Asby / Martha Metzl5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-28vs JBlack/TStamey (Matthews)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVan ONeill / Christy Haseltine vs Chelse Stevens / Donna Musante4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Krenz / Kathleen Early vs Nancy Miller / Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSydney Gaston / Alexandria McNulty vs Lisa Pacello / Catherine LaChance3-6, 4-6
2025-08-21vs SGrindle (Weddington)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSydney Gaston / Palak Merchant vs Kristin Kapur / Amy Barrett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Arliss Day vs Kristy Brannock / Michele Ovendorf4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMitchell Kelling / Kim Gissy vs Dawn Castain / Chloe Castain5-7, 1-6
2025-08-19vs LPinzon/LDifazio (Life Time)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Early / Katie van Valkinburgh vs Leidys Pinzon / Lori DiFazio6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesArliss Day / Sarah Krenz vs Susan McDonald / Cherie Wright3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandria McNulty / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs Gladys Shinmoto / Jennifer Siddall6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Alexandria McNulty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Lindsay Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Christy Haseltine
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Kathleen Early
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Sarah Krenz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Palak Merchant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Sydney Gaston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Mitchell Kelling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Kim Gissy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Van ONeill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Arliss Day
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Katie van Valkinburgh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Gaston + Christy Haseltine123 matchesnot enough data
Palak Merchant + Katie van Valkinburgh213 matchesnot enough data
Palak Merchant + Christy Haseltine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandria McNulty
4W–11L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Lindsay Smith
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Christy Haseltine
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kathleen Early
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Sarah Krenz
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Palak Merchant
44W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
16W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sydney Gaston
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Mitchell Kelling
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Kim Gissy
99W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Van ONeill
18W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
Arliss Day
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie van Valkinburgh
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.