Teams

WH Schnur SSL A18-3.5W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (8 player)

22 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-13vs MVS Huffman SSL A18-3.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Scheonrock / Karen Heggen-Cheng vs Julie Walton / Kristen Schestag3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJalynn Schnr vs Alyssa Vandenberg6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNichole Watts / Katie DeNooyer vs Hope Margherio / Caroline Hall6-7, 6-6
L#2 SinglesStella Chivikas vs Allison Klingenberg3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Betten / Margaret Zahrai vs Andrea Wolfe / Marie Amash3-6, 4-6
2022-05-06vs HC Irish SSL A18-3.5WWon 41
W#1 DoublesStephanie Nobis / Sandy Doroh vs Jasmine Irish / Mindy Koschmann6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMallory Humphrey vs Claudia Watkins6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKelsey Pellowe / Mauri VanDenBerg vs Theresa Cusworth / Michelle Daane6-4, 6-5
L#2 SinglesMichelle Larason vs Tanna Immink1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Sanborn / Heather Ballines vs Nicole Fender / Dawn Hildebrand7-5, 6-7
2022-04-29vs MVS Stevens SSL A18-3.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesJalynn Schnr / Stephanie Nobis vs Beth Fuehrer / Kim Tucker6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMauri VanDenBerg vs Brenda Stagg3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNichole Watts / Katie DeNooyer vs Michelle Madden / Beth Balon2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Heggen-Cheng vs Susan Popiel1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Zahrai / Corin Nulty vs Cindy Vander Ploeg / Linda Thomason6-2, 6-3
2022-04-15vs PY Fogarty SSL A18-3.5WWon 50
W#1 DoublesJalynn Schnr / Stephanie Lowes vs Glorianna Fogarty / Dana Cunningham6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMallory Humphrey vs Carmen Harris7-5, 6-5
W#2 DoublesKatie DeNooyer / Kelsey Pellowe vs Leigh Garrison / Patricia Randall6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMauri VanDenBerg vs Donna Weber6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Larason / Megan Sanborn vs Lindsey White / Margaret Rohs6-4, 6-2
2022-03-11vs PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5WWon 41
W#1 DoublesSandy Doroh / Stephanie Lowes vs Sherri Lawrence / Cynthia Swain6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMauri VanDenBerg vs Andrea Skidmore3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJalynn Schnr / Heather Ballines vs Ruth Kohley / Amy Grasman6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesStella Chivikas vs Carrita Plaskewicz4-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Betten / Lee Ann Scheonrock vs Volita Vinoski / Mary Burdo3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-04vs MVR Herremans SSL A18-3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesStephanie Lowes / Jalynn Schnr vs Gayl Kessel / Pam Kloet3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMallory Humphrey vs Pauline Unfried6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Nobis / Julie Kennedy vs Kelli Kovack / Judy Siegel1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStella Chivikas vs Jane Gillis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLee Ann Scheonrock / Margaret Zahrai vs Tricia Lyon / Anne Neis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-04vs MVH Johnson SSL A18-3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesHeather Ballines / Sandy Doroh vs Sara Johnson / Jill Farran-Andrade6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJalynn Schnr vs Luann Mullen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Nobis / Julie Kennedy vs Marta Stanley / Katie Hartgerink6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCorin Nulty vs Kerri Stoel0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Heggen-Cheng / Lee Ann Scheonrock vs Ann Radke / Abby McAlpine6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVH Johnson SSL A18-3.5W61211435310
2MVS Huffman SSL A18-3.5W52211430304
3MVR Herremans SSL A18-3.5W52211435304
4WH Schnur SSL A18-3.5W34201536301
5PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5W34171838330
6MVS Stevens SSL A18-3.5W34142146332
7PY Fogarty SSL A18-3.5W25142146333
8HC Irish SSL A18-3.5W16122347331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Mallory Humphrey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.71
Mauri VanDenBerg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.65
Jalynn Schnr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.56
Heather Ballines
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Stephanie Nobis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Corin Nulty
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Stephanie Lowes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.32
Stella Chivikas
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.25
Sandy Doroh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Michelle Larason
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Margaret Zahrai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Lisa Betten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Nichole Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Megan Sanborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Julie Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Kelli Peterson
published
2.96
Lee Ann Scheonrock
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Heggen-Cheng
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Katie DeNooyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Pellowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miranda Garside
published
Stephanie Rex
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Betten + Lee Ann Scheonrock6165% games+12.6% vs expected
Nichole Watts + Corin Nulty6159% games+11.8% vs expected
Mauri VanDenBerg + Kelsey Pellowe6162% games+10.3% vs expected
Stephanie Nobis + Katie DeNooyer6067% games+9.9% vs expected
Heather Ballines + Sandy Doroh10460% games+6.9% vs expected
Jalynn Schnr + Heather Ballines3850% games+6.0% vs expected
Stephanie Rex + Julie Kennedy4352% games+5.2% vs expected
Jalynn Schnr + Kelsey Pellowe4253% games+4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Humphrey
51W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Mauri VanDenBerg
78W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Jalynn Schnr
102W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Heather Ballines
95W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Stephanie Nobis
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Corin Nulty
87W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Stephanie Lowes
47W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Stella Chivikas
82W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Sandy Doroh
91W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Michelle Larason
67W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Margaret Zahrai
83W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Betten
52W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Nichole Watts
42W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Megan Sanborn
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Julie Kennedy
42W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Kelli Peterson
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
Lee Ann Scheonrock
42W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
Karen Heggen-Cheng
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie DeNooyer
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelsey Pellowe
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Miranda Garside
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Rex
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.