Teams

8 MAC Overhead Slammers - Miranowicz

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-03vs 12 Burkwood Jones 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Johnson vs Abel Guzman1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNick Coppola vs Brandon Malone1-6, 2-6
2025-10-27vs 10 Westwood BakerSplit 11
W#2 SinglesTucker Cole vs Kennon Harrison4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJason Yost vs Daniel McCool3-6, 1-6
2025-10-20vs 1 MTC JacobsenLost 03
L#1 SinglesRoger Wisor vs Christopher Geoghegan1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Joyner vs Niell Jacobsen4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSIMON MIRANOWICZ vs Alexander Feldman3-6, 3-6
2025-10-13vs 6 Chestnut Oaks 2.0 - CargiuloWon 20
W#2 SinglesNick Coppola vs Sam Berg6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTucker Cole vs John Ley6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRoger Wisor vs Benjamin Pham7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNick Coppola vs Long Duong6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJason Yost vs Jim Swisher3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-29vs 14 WOCC 3.5 Singles - MullinaxWon 21
L#1 SinglesDavid Joyner vs Scott Boyle1-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesSIMON MIRANOWICZ vs Shawn Harwood3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRoger Wisor vs Ivan Mullinax6-1, 6-1
2025-09-22vs 13 Avalon Singlets - BeldingWon 30
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Johnson vs Guillermo Pardo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTucker Cole vs Jeremy Berteele2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesNick Coppola vs Richard Stowers6-4, 7-5
2025-09-15vs 11 Kanawha BarrangerWon 21
W#1 SinglesRoger Wisor vs Creighton Anders6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDavid Joyner vs Eric Miller6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJason Yost vs Patrick Barranger0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Roger Wisor
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.37
Tucker Cole
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.36
David Joyner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
SIMON MIRANOWICZ
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Jason Yost
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Michael Steele
published
Nick Coppola
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Wisor + David Joyner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roger Wisor
38W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Tucker Cole
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
David Joyner
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
SIMON MIRANOWICZ
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Jason Yost
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Michael Steele
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Coppola
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.