Teams

Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR

2026 Ruston Adult 55 & Over - Women · 3.5 Ruston (55&O) Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-09vs Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnita House / Debra Cox vs Tiphanie Maxwell / Kim Schlessman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSherry Hamilton / Dana Dukes vs Cindy Eaton / Laura Smith4-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita House / Martha Lancaster vs Lynn Barron / Kim Schlessman3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Bennett / Kathy Manning vs Laura Smith / Tracie Ellerman0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Hamilton / Dana Dukes vs Carleen Dumas / Cindy Eaton6-2, 6-2
2026-02-23vs Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita House / Martha Lancaster vs Laura Smith / Lynn Barron6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Manning / Debra Cox vs Debbie THURSTON / Tiphanie Maxwell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Ruston (55&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR2154879
2Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR12451084

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Martha Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Dana Dukes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debra Cox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Anita House
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.66
Kathy Manning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sheri Pippin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita House + Debra Cox213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Lancaster
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Dana Dukes
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Debra Cox
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anita House
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kathy Manning
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.66
Sheri Pippin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.