Teams

Barnes 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesCameron Holcomb / Olivia Beane vs Shannon Roley / Allison Peters2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSophia de Vries / Karin Rochester vs Jenna Petty / Jennifer Ayers1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Milloway / Cristina Voorheis vs Hunter Arnett / Meghan Hadley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-24vs Schuster 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesOlivia Beane / Cameron Holcomb vs Suki Gutierrez / Tia Opyd5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Lyndsey Grubb vs Graceanne Schuster / Megan Stanley4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLorraine Rusch / Katie Tucker vs Julia Brodeur / Carla Vilton6-1, 7-5
L#1 DoublesSusan Barnes / Karin Rochester vs Ginger Ballard / Julie Mcgehee3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesOlivia Beane / Katie Tucker vs Nicole Wurl / DEBORAH WELLS1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLorraine Rusch / Sophia de Vries vs Amanda Tapler / Chelsea Ward2-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs Ray/Tucker 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Wuebker / Leslie Patterson vs Melinda Tucker / Jenna Bialik-Speight4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCristina Voorheis / Laura Milloway vs Carrie Kerby / Judy Tsuei7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Karin Rochester vs Mitzi Burchinal / Megan Ray1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Katie Tucker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Laura Milloway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Leslie Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Cristina Voorheis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.39
Karin Rochester
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Cameron Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Colleen Pinyan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Janice Wuebker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Lyndsey Grubb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Sophia de Vries
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.93
Allison Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Olivia Beane
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Milloway + Cristina Voorheis101147% games+7.5% vs expected
Lyndsey Grubb + Janice Wuebker0618% games−14.0% vs expected
Allison Sharpe + Lyndsey Grubb1426% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Tucker
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Laura Milloway
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Leslie Patterson
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Cristina Voorheis
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Karin Rochester
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Lorraine Rusch
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Cameron Holcomb
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Colleen Pinyan
8W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Janice Wuebker
4W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Lyndsey Grubb
4W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Sophia de Vries
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Allison Sharpe
5W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Olivia Beane
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.