Teams

LA - Mulholland Drivers

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-03vs LA - JBeesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Kathleen Hipps vs Tori Thompson / Lisa Yu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs LA - Get a GripLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Kathleen Hipps vs Roopika Malhotra / Nicole Ryan4-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs LA - Eastside SwingersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hipps / Anisha Pattanaik vs Natasha Kirk / Hillary Curley6-0, 6-1
2024-09-28vs LA - Queen Anne 3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hipps / Anisha Pattanaik vs Andrea Dunlop / Sirin Sanglimsuwan7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKathleen Hipps / Anisha Pattanaik vs Amanda Kain / Ana Franco3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Anisha Pattanaik
published 3.5
3.22
Kay Cannon
published
3.16
Kathleen Hipps
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.79
Maya Lebenzon
published
2.73
Andi Schoffman
published 3
2.59
Suzanne Sergile
published
2.23
Lauren Morphew
published
2.19
LeAnn Aharonian
published
2.04
Sarah Carter
published
Kamala Raphael
published
Lenore Zerman
published
Wendy Magdlen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Hipps + Anisha Pattanaik4749% games−0.1% vs expected
Anisha Pattanaik + Kay Cannon404 matchesnot enough data
Maya Lebenzon + Andi Schoffman224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Morphew + LeAnn Aharonian123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anisha Pattanaik
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kay Cannon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kathleen Hipps
78W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Maya Lebenzon
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Andi Schoffman
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Suzanne Sergile
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
Lauren Morphew
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
LeAnn Aharonian
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Sarah Carter
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Kamala Raphael
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lenore Zerman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Magdlen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.