Teams

SSC Roses

2022 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekend · 8.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-26vs River Strand BarnardWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Rose / Cheryl Lyn vs Hattie Grimsley / Denise Holland7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCindy Fancher / Wendy Hillock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-12vs Longwood DeuitchWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Lyn / Michele Rose vs Tami Dalto / Dorene Seider4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPat Brugger / Wendy Hillock vs Lorie Gianos / Marjorie Petruccelli6-1, 6-1
2022-11-05vs Longwood WilsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesDonna Mink / Ann Davy vs Susan Marro / SueAnn Sanders2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarsha Timm / Wendy Hillock vs Sally Alford / Kristine Szarkowitz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-29vs River Strand BarnardLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Fancher / Wendy Hillock vs Joan Pennello / Nancy Finman4-6, 0-6
2022-10-22vs Longwood DeuitchLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Mink / Kelley Beall vs Lynn Deuitch / Donna Hannigan2-6, 2-6
2022-10-15vs Longwood WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Fancher / Wendy Hillock vs Mary Wilson / Ana Areosa6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-08vs River Strand BarnardLost 01
L#1 DoublesPat Brugger / Cheryl Lyn vs Motoyo Arii / Judi Wilson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Fancher / Kelley Beall vs Mary Wilson / Manda Jordan4-6, 3-6
2022-09-17vs Longwood DeuitchWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Rose / Cheryl Lyn vs Tami Dalto / Lorie Gianos6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Cindy Fancher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Pat Brugger
published 4.5
4.03
Michele Rose
published
3.95
Wendy Hillock
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.76
Donna Mink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Cheryl Lyn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Sara Johnson
published
3.67
Marsha Timm
published
3.60
Ann Davy
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Fancher + Pat Brugger3447% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Hillock + Cindy Fancher5157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Fancher
68W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Pat Brugger
58W–37L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Wendy Hillock
92W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Donna Mink
107W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Cheryl Lyn
69W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Sara Johnson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Marsha Timm
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Ann Davy
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.